DeDunking YouTube's archaeoastronomy skeptics

 

There's a new YouTube channel that's worth checking out; DeDunking

DeDunker is a Hancock fan, but without all the WOO. He thinks Hancock is probably on to something, and there probably was some kind of lost civilisation, without being specific about when or what it looked like. This seems quite reasonable. He doesn't defend Hancock to the hilt, of course he can't, but he does take aim at the popular YouTube critics of Hancock who misrepresent his position, or haven't done their homework, or who are mischievous, sly or deceitful. He's basically on the side of science and argues from good faith. I like his approach and he makes a lot of good points. It helps that DeDunker is a fan of archaeoastronomy, which is something that archaeologists typically ignore to their own detriment.

It seems he likes my work on Gobekli Tepe too, and also takes on David Miano's unethical videos about me. He asked for info in advance about this.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Debunking YouTube's archaeoastronomy skeptics

Holliday et al.'s (2023) Gish Gallop: timing of the Younger-Dryas onset and Greenland platinum spike

Gobekli Tepe's Pillars