Zodiacal dating the Burghead Bulls


A Pictish (Burghead) bull symbol stone in the National Museum of Scotland

The Pictish bull symbol has had a hard time justifying itself. Jackson (in The Symbol Stones of Scotland) claims it is not a Pictish symbol at all, because it never occurs in a pair - which is his definition of a Pictish symbol. Cummins (in The Picts and their Symbols) makes no mention of bull symbols at all. This is despite around 30 'individual' bull symbols being found at Burghead that have the same style as all the other Pictish symbols. Only 6 of these symbols have survived (one is in the National Museum of Scotland - see above).

Burghead is the site of an ancient Pictish fort, thought to be the oldest and largest Pictish site of all. While radiocarbon evidence suggests the ancient fort dates back to the 5th century BC, much older iron age and even bronze age finds have been uncovered nearby, indicating the area was occupied from a very early time.

Apart from its bull symbols, Burghead is known for its 'burning of the Clavie' festival. This is essentially a fire worship festival that occurs on the date of the old New Year. Therefore, it was probably an ancient winter solstice festival originally. The Clavie is a kind of giant torch that is carried around the town by the Clavie-bearers. Embers from the Clavie would be taken home to light fireplaces, and it is even said they are a defence against witches.

Now, given the large number of bull symbols at Burghead, and assuming they ARE Pictish, as is obviously the case, it makes sense that they have a deliberate and correct meaning. I'm suggesting the Burghead bulls are not just 'mistakes' or 'practice' pieces. If so, then we can estimate a date for them using our zodiacal dating method.

Of course, we know the bull as the constellation Taurus these days. This association comes to us from Bronze Age Mesopotamia, through Ancient Greece. However, in our ancient zodiac, the bull represents Capricornus. Everywhere else we have observed bulls, from Palaeolithic art through to Gobekli Tepe, Catalhoyuk, and the Pashaputi Seal of Mohenjo-Daro, the bull represents Capricornus, not Taurus.

Interestingly, Capricornus is the winter solstice constellation from around 1800 BC through to 0 AD. After this time, Sagittarius (represented by the eagle/vulture) is the winter solstice constellation. Therefore, it appears that the Burghead bull symbols are more ancient than most of the other Pictish symbols, as they likely represent Caprcornus at the winter solstice before 0 AD, pre-dating the eagle symbols. The fact that the burning of the Clavie festival is also held in Burghead on the old New Year (i.e. winter solstice) date adds further weight to this dating of the bull symbols.

The antiquity of these bull symbols possibly also explains their slight difference from usual class I Pictish symbols stones, in that they are not paired with other symbols. I suggest, therefore, that we should provide a new class of more ancient Pictish symbol stone - let's call them class 0 - to which the Burghead bulls belong.

Comments

  1. DarwinJanuary 17, 2020 at 10:34 AM

    I would love to see more work from you on Britain.
    I'm just getting into interpretations of Newgrange specifically - books being: Stones of Time, Irish Symbols 3500 BC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Prehistory DecodedJanuary 18, 2020 at 11:23 AM

      And there will be - the British at the same time as the Picts seem to have been using the same system. More to follow.

      Delete
    2. DarwinJanuary 18, 2020 at 2:12 PM

      I haven't remembered every item name for source, but the Engravings in Knowth in Ireland, show the same calendrical system as the grid tablet that was found in France, and that Echoes perfectly with classical sources telling how the Celts organized their calendars.
      What I find intriguing is that classical sources also say not the Celts, or The Druids possessed a very remarkable system of astronomy, and they were the best at it. And then there is all the work done on Star myths for the Celts, and that's hard to Discount because of all the numbers that are used, 12's, sevens, dogs, Salmon, threes, Rivers, white bulls, Brown bulls, swans, babies, beheadings, one eyed giants, etc. Fascinating

      Delete
    3. DarwinJanuary 18, 2020 at 2:13 PM

      There's a few typos in there i can't edit. Anyhow, thanks for the reply!

      Delete
  2. DarwinJanuary 18, 2020 at 2:15 PM

    Speak of the devil! I didn't see the new post. This is going to be excellent reading! Very very exciting stuff

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Debunking YouTube's archaeoastronomy skeptics

Image
                                    Image from Scijinks.gov Some YouTube commentators, like Milo Rossi of MiniMinuteman and Stefan Milo, have made ignorant comments about the astronomical interpretation of Gobekli Tepe and Pillar 43. Below, I make the scientific case for this interpretation. Q: What is science? A: Science attempts to create consistent models of reality. Q: What is a good model? A: One that has a lot of explaining power relative to its inputs. This is also known as Occam's razor, parsimony, and model efficiency. Q: How do we measure the 'explaining power'? A: There are many ways, but the best is to use statistical methods, including hypothesis testing. Examples of statistics in science Suppose 100 pills given to a random sample of people, of which 50 are placebos. Suppose all those taking the pill are dead by the next day, but none of those taking the placebo are dead. Conclusion: the pill is deadly. The hypothesis “The pill is deadly” is made a posteriori
Read more

Holliday et al.'s (2023) Gish Gallop: timing of the Younger-Dryas onset and Greenland platinum spike

Image
The location of several Greenland ice cores, from Steffensen et al. (2008). Over the next few months/year I'll post a regular series of blog posts that deconstruct Holliday et al.'s (2023) (henceforth, just Holliday et al.) "comprehensive refutation" of the YDIH. Some common themes will become apparent. Essentially, there are no refutation arguments at all in it, so their title is misleading. Remember, the meaning of 'refute' is to 'disprove', but there are no arguments in Holliday et al. that disprove the YDIH. It's also worth looking up the  'Gish gallop' fallacy, because that is what is happening here. Holliday et al.'s paper might be extremely long, but it is lacking in serious arguments, and there are certainly no refutations. First up in this blog post is the timing of the YD climate change (specifically its onset) and the Greenland platinum spike. The relevant sections of Holliday et al. are 3.3 and 5.1. My comments are in itali
Read more

Gobekli Tepe's Pillars

Image
Significance: Gobekli Tepe (GT) probably represents the origin of civilisation for most of the world today. Most of us are connected to it in some way, through language and religion (proto-Nostratic), or genetics at least. The Pillars: GT is famous for its anomalous megalithic pillars, and especially the symbols carved on them. Most people think these symbols are telling an important story - they are not just random pictures of animals. Klauss Schmidt, who discovered GT and led its excavation, until his death in 2014, certainly thought so. It follows that the only way we will ever be able to properly understand Gobekli Tepe, and therefore the origin of civilisation, is through reading its pillars. Deutsche Archaeological Institute : the DAI operates the Gobekli Tepe dig. Despite the immense significance of the site, they continue to have a casual disregard for the information encoded on its pillars. Over 60 pillars have been uncovered, but only around 20 are documented by the DAI. Alt
Read more